About Me

Name: Killian Lansingh
Email: killianlansingh@gmail.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

My "Solve Illegal Immigration Now!" Solution

Dear readers:
I haven't had so much time these last week so I haven't been able to write and read some articles so I'm going to re-post this article I wrote on American Solutions. Please rate it here...

1. Securing the Border:Short term: add security personnel and technology and send back all those who are caught. Long term: Build a fence that will be paid with the"New Citizen Tax".

2. Add crossing the border as a misdemeanor to their criminal background. Deport them if they commit any crime.

3. Give them a 3-year period of temporary residency. Thy can apply for a job, take free English lessons and rent a house. Then they can take the Naturalization Test and become citizens.

4. Once they have a job they will have to pay the New Citizen Tax: an extra 5% added to the income tax over 12 years. Now that they can work legally their income will probably increase. Say the average is $40000 a year. 5% of 40000 is $2000. Over 12years, $24000 times the 3.5 million workers = $84 billion. That’s enough tocover the bailouts of: General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,JP Morgan, Merril Lynch and that still leaves $4 billion.

5. Increase fines on businesses that hire illegal aliens and force them to be fired.

6. Crack down on sanctuary cities

 

Cost of this Solution $20 billion
Key Facts/Specific Polling Data
91% -- Illegal immigration is an important problem
82% -- Not enough is done to stop illegal immigration
76% -- Illegal aliens shouldn't have driver's license
67% -- Increase military forces on the border
65% -- Want illegal population to decrease
63% -- Illegal aliens cost too much
60% -- Support a path to citizenship with requirements and a fine
52% -- Building a fence
52% -- Illegal aliens hurt US more than they help
5% -- Want the amount of illegal aliens to increase

Please rate it here on American Solutions...
Please read my blog: http://killianlansingh.blogspot.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stem Cell Research by Killian Lansingh

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.     
      When the Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence, there was little debate about bioethical issues because science and technology were not as advanced as today. Abortion, contraception and stem cell research are very recent things, so it would be impossible to say that there is absolutely no doubt that they would favor any position regarding these topics. But there are some clues that can help us know what there opinion would probably be. If all men are created equal, then no human can be worth more than other. They also added that every human has basic rights which can't be taken away. We must ask ourselves a very important question: When does human life start? 
 Looking at this question from a scientific point of view the Westchester Institute for Ethics & the Human Person concludes:    Based on universally accepted scientific criteria, a new cell, the human zygote, comes into existence at the moment of sperm-egg fusion, an event that occurs in less than a second. Upon formation, the zygote immediately initiates a complex sequence of events that establish the molecular conditions required for continued embryonic development. The behavior of the zygote is radically unlike that of either sperm or egg separately and is characteristic of a human organism. Thus, the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that a zygote is a human organism and that the life of a new human being commences at a scientifically well defined “moment of conception.”                                                                                                           Dr Maureen Condic Ph.D, B.A.    

     There are hundreds of quotes from doctors that could be used here but to make things simpler I shall keep things as short as possible. As you see, it is a myth that when human life starts depends on morality or religion. Now that we know that embryos and fetuses are human beings, we should think: Is it right to sacrifice an innocent and dependent person involuntarily so that we can cure someone? I think most people would be unwilling to give their life so that their neighbor could have better health. Embryos are destroyed during scientific research so that some diseases can be cured.
     But the worst part is that human embryos are being cloned so that scientists can have more of them. Creating humans to destroy them and making profit of it must be one of the worst immoral acts possible. Embryos have become a commodity or another material for science to test on. Science must have its limits. It should co exist with morality other wise science becomes a tool for evil rather than a tool for good. Whenever conservatives put limits on science they say we oppose it. But all we are trying to do is to keep science ethical even if that means prohibiting certain research.
   President Obama said that he would "make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology." But that is exactly what he is doing: ignoring the fact that the Constitution guarantees a right to life for humans (including embryos), and deciding based on his liberal belief that those who are born are more valuable than those who aren't. I wonder whether he doesn't know he was an embryo or that he feels safe from being destroyed now that he is born.  
 To sum up, human life starts at conception, period. Destroying life to cure life is absurd. Obama should encourage other types of research where embryos aren't destroyed and ban those which do. Everything has a limit, science does to. Otherwise it becomes a method of destruction of the human race. And I think most Americans would agree with me, Mr President.

Please read my blog: http://killianlansingh.blogspot.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

50 year of the Cuban Revolution; Half a Century of Myths Exposed

Dear Readers:
I have been on holidays for the last few weeks, and I had minimal access to the internet. That's why I haven`t posted anything recently but during my free time I wrote this:

From Michael Moore to Ted Turner, many on the left have expressed admiration of “Che” Guevara and Fidel Castro; the two leaders of “La Revolución”. But is this Marxist movement really as they say?

Liberals always claim to favor free speech, liberty and democracy yet the Cuban government respects these as much as terrorists defend innocent women and children. There is no such thing as individual or corporate profit, the whole economy is managed by the government. Education, health care, the media, everything. Your only source of money, is your income which is provided to you by the government. No matter how hard you work or how good you are, you earn as much as every single person who has the same job as you around the whole country. And we aren’t talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars. Doctors are paid less than $100 a month.

Fidel Castro has always hated losing even when he played baseball as a kid, so it is not hard to understand why Che’s following phrase became famous: “Hasta la victoria, siempre” (“Until victory, always”). Another thing liberals oppose is the death penalty. Thousands of criminals and others who, for example, oppose the government have been executed on the small island. Che, killed many hostages he had kidnapped even if they were children. He trusted “hate as a factor in the battle; uncompromised hate toward the enemy, that takes you further than the natural limitations of human beings, that converts you in to an effective, violent, selective and cold killing machine. He once wrote to his mother saying: “Dear mother, here in Cuba, alive and bloodthirsty, I write these part felt lines.”

Trials against those accused of helping Batista (the previous dictator the rebels overthrew) lasted less than 10 minutes. The verdict was decided by Che and the punishment was death by shooting. Many of the executed were probably innocent.

Books like Orwell’s 1984, which warn about the social danger of totalitarianism, are banned, and reading it is enough to be sent to prison. Members of the opposition are executed, disappear and are imprisoned, under excuses such as treason, agitator, among others. Cuba is the only country in America that holds prisoners for their beliefs.

Democrats like to say they can be bipartisan and reach across the aisle, but in Cuba, that is impossible; the only political party is the Communist Party and if you’re not a member, you can kiss your aspirations goodbye. Dems accuse people who are anti-gay marriage as intolerant and xenophobic, yet in Cuba, the government treats them as mentally ill and marginalizes them. The inhabitants can’t even choose their president; he is elected by a committee, formed by important members of “The Party”.

The only news they get is the one the government provides them. They can’t leave their own country, and even in the island, there are some places only foreign can go to. Hotels and some stores are an example. Now, that Raul Castro is in power he has given them allowed them to go to some of these places, but they can’t pay a room or a cell phone, so, not much of a change…

In Cuba, freedom is but a dream… the Revolutionists want the people to think that government knows what is best for you and for society. All they want is power, and this obsessive search for equality has destroyed any possible prosperity, making the upper and middle class poor, instead of making the middle and lower class rich.

More proof, that socialism is ineffective, is that Cuba has always been dependant of other countries, such as, the USSR and Venezuela. Hundreds of thousands have fled the country and tens of thousands have suicide over the last 50 years.

Socialist Cuba cannot survive without economic help, and lifting the embargo will make any change in the economic system, forced by the need of capital, impossible.

In the 60’s Fidel nationalized foreign countries, took control of schools, hospitals and the media and even confiscated lands that belonged to the Catholic Church.

WAS IT WORTH IT?

Cuba has 99.8% of alphabetization, and a child mortality rate of 6 out of every 1000 born. But in 1957, Cuba already was one of the most alphabetized and calorie consuming countries in Latin America, and it had the lowest mortality rate.

Cuban income is $6000 per year, according to the government but the real number is actually $240; 25 times lower than the official one. Even if it really was $6000, Cuba would rank 21stamong Latin American countries. In 1959 Cuba had more televisions per family than any other of these countries but that record has been lost. 9% of Cubans have access to a land line, 2% to the internet, and 1% have a cell phone. As mentioned before, Cuba has a high suicide rate, 25 every 100,000 according to the World Health Organization. Almost 10% of the population has fled the country, and thousands have died trying to leave the island. There have been at least 8250 disappeared or executed. There are been tens of thousands of political prisoners including journalists. The regime says the people support The Revolution, but if it was that way, they wouldn’t be afraid of people voting to choose their leaders in a democratic way.

Many blame the embargo, despite the US being the main exporter to the island. Countries like Chile, have achieved an incredibly larger economic progress, and they didn’t have to sacrifice as much liberty and human rights as communist Cuba. Others ask why we don’t free the oppressed Cubans. But we can’t because during the missile crisis with Cuba, the Soviets agreed to take their nuclear warheads away if we wouldn’t invade or allow any other country to do so. We Americans are honorable people, and we must keep our word.

Those who claim religion causes more problems than it solves, they should notice that many atheists, since they don’t care about doing what’s rights to save one’s soul, try to find as much pleasure as possible before they die. Do not get me wrong, there are some great secularists around...

To sum up, Cuba is another example of how Marxist governance doesn’t work. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is what made America great. Freedom brings success (and failure). Oppression is inhumane and destroys progress that has been achieved. What Cubans really want is not “equality” but opportunity.


Please read my blog: http://killianlansingh.blogspot.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why we need to get rid of the electoral process

We have had four times that the candidate the was supported by less one the election:
1876, 1888, 2000. Please don`t get me wrong: I definitely would have chosen George Bush over Al Gore. But here we are talking about what is fair.
What if the American public chose candidate X and our system elected Candidate Y. Is that fair? What would the founding fathers say? At the time of the creation of this process it was great because travel could take months. But with all the technology today it is possible for everyone`s vote to count. If I am a Republican and vote in California, do you think my vote is going to count?
If I am a Democrat and vote in Utah? MY VOTE WILL NOT COUNT!
Is this real democracy?

Please read my blog: http://killianlansingh.blogspot.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »